Skip to main content

Cancellation of GST registration justified due to non-furnishing of evidence on movement of goods

AAR gave an important Ruling dated 27th August 2019 regarding the order passed by the competent authority of cancellation of registration of assessee in a case of Om Trading Co. V. Deputy Commissioner of State-tax [2019] 110 taxmann.com 378 (Madhya Pradesh) which is discussed as below:                   

Facts of the Case
  • The assessee a dealer located in Gwalior alleged that it had purchased certain ghee from a dealer located in Agra.
  • The Competent Authority having found that the assessee had failed to prove by any forceful documentary evidence that the ghee in question was physically transferred from Agra to Gwalior cancelled the registration of assessee.
Observation/ruling
  • HC held that when the impugned order is tested on the anvil of material on record and in absence of any forceful documentary evidence to prove that the ghee in question was physically transferred from Agra to Gwalior, the Court does not find any error in the order rendered by the Competent Authority as well as Appellate Authority, as would warrant any indulgence.
  • Therefore the writ petition filed by the assessee deserved to be dismissed. 
Please click here for Ruling.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

14% GST applicable on carbonated fruit drink/ juice

Recently AAR gave an important ruling dated 17 th  October, 2019 regarding tax rate and HSN code of fruit beverages or drinks in case of Kalis Sparkling water (P). Ltd.  [2019] 112  taxmann.com  4 (AAR-TAMIL NADU)  which is discussed as below: Facts of the Case The applicant stated that they are going to manufacture beverages with fruit juices and without milk. They understand from the industry that fruit pulp or fruit juice based drinks fall under HSN code 22029020 liable to be taxed at 12%. They state that fruit juice-based drinks should be called "Carbonated beverage with fruit juice" as per Para 3A definition in FSSAI Act. Issue Involved What is the rate of tax and HSN Code for fruit beverages or drinks? Observation/Judgment AAR held that the product falls under the category of "Other" under CTH 2202 10 90. The applicable rate of tax is 28%. Please  click here  for order.

Agent required mandatory GST registration for supplying taxable goods

AAR gave an important ruling dated 12 th  September, 2019 regarding registration of agent for receipt of dry chilies from farmers & supply to traders in case of  Morigeri Traders [2019] 110  taxmann.com  200 (AAR-KARNATAKA)  which is discussed as below:   Facts of the Case The applicant is into the business of rendering service of supplying dry chillies on behalf of farmers to the traders as commission agents. They sell goods on behalf of farmers to the traders, issue invoices to the traders/buyers as prescribed under the APMC Act and also issue sale patties to the farmers. They collect a commission on the services provided to the farmers from the purchasers and the same is also shown in the invoice issued to the purchasers. Issue Involved Whether the applicant is required to be registered under the GST Act?  Observation/Ruling Schedule I CGST Act, 2017 states that “Supply of goods— (a) by a principal to his agen

High Court directed authorities to re-open portal for filing of Form GST TRAN-1

High Court of  Guwahat i  gave an important judgment dated 26 th  September, 2019 regarding filing of Form GSTR TRAN-1 electronically or manually in case of Sakshi motors V. Union of India  [2019] 112  taxmann.com  223 (GUAHATI)  which is discussed as below: Facts of the Case The applicant is a private limited company engaged in the trade of dealing in food items, edibles, FMCG etc. They are unable to submit the Form GST TRAN-2 in relation to Part-7A. According to the applicant, they have submitted TRAN-1 return in a proper complete and correct manner. But inspite of such filing, the GST portal does not reflect the value of the stock returned, against which he is entitled to get import credit on filing of TRAN-2 return. Observation/Judgment It is observed that the taxpayer had made all the attempts to file the form electronically but because of computer glitches, the same could not be filed. Therefore, HC directed taxpaying