Skip to main content

Bank accounts cannot be attached tax has been paid even if there is no receipt of goods: GST Updates

Recently HC of gave an important judgment dated 28th August, 2019 regarding availment of input tax credit without physical receipt of goods in case of Pranit Hem Desai V. Additional Director General, [2019] 110 472 (GUJARAT) which is discussed as below:

Facts of the Case
  • The Competent Authority had provisionally attached the bank accounts of the taxpayer under section 83 on the allegation that it without physical receipt of goods availed credit on basis of the invoices issued by the input supplier and thereafter paid GST on the basis of the output invoices without physical supply of the goods to the buyers.
  • The competent authority passed order as the allegation levied against that the goods were not supplied, yet the tax was paid for the purpose of passing the credit. Thus, no GST was payable, yet the same was paid.
  • Taxpayer filed a writ against this order. Petitioner stated that Section 9, which is the charging section, which contemplates that the GST is payable only when the goods are supplied. The output liability paid is Rs. 4.13 cr. excess than the amount of credit availed of.
  • High court observed that Section 83 empowers the Tax Authority to make a provisional attachment of any properties of the taxpayer to protect the interest of the revenue. It should neither be used as a tool to harass the taxpayer nor should it be used in a manner which may have an irreversible detrimental effect on the business of the taxpayer.
  • Orders of provisional attachment must be in writing and there must be some material on record to indicate that the Competent Authority had formed an opinion on the basis thereof that it was necessary to attach the property in order to protect the interest of the revenue. The provisional attachment provided under section 83 is more like an attachment before judgment under the Code of Civil Procedure. This power should be exercised by the Authority only if there is a reasonable apprehension that the assessee may default the ultimate collection of the demand that is likely to be raised on completion of the assessment.
  • Moreover attachment should be made of the properties and to the extent it is required to achieve the above object. It should neither be used as a tool to harass the assessee nor should it be used in a manner which may have an irreversible determinantal effect on the business of the assessee.
  • High court held that an amount of Rs. 4.13 crores has been paid in excess than the amount of credit availed. Therefore, it cannot be said that the interest of the Government revenue is at a stake.
  • Therefore, the order of provisional attachment of the bank accounts of the taxpayer required to be quashed and set aside.
Please click here for order.


Popular posts from this blog

14% GST applicable on carbonated fruit drink/ juice

Recently AAR gave an important ruling dated 17th October, 2019 regarding tax rate and HSN code of fruit beverages or drinks in case of Kalis Sparkling water (P). Ltd. [2019] 112 4 (AAR-TAMIL NADU) which is discussed as below: Facts of the Case The applicant stated that they are going to manufacture beverages with fruit juices and without milk. They understand from the industry that fruit pulp or fruit juice based drinks fall under HSN code 22029020 liable to be taxed at 12%.They state that fruit juice-based drinks should be called "Carbonated beverage with fruit juice" as per Para 3A definition in FSSAI Act.Issue Involved What is the rate of tax and HSN Code for fruit beverages or drinks?Observation/Judgment AAR held that the product falls under the category of "Other" under CTH 2202 10 90. The applicable rate of tax is 28%.Please click here for order.

Agent required mandatory GST registration for supplying taxable goods

AAR gave an important ruling dated 12th September, 2019 regarding registration of agent for receipt of dry chilies from farmers & supply to traders in case of Morigeri Traders [2019] 110 200 (AAR-KARNATAKA) which is discussed as below:

Facts of the Case The applicant is into the business of rendering service of supplying dry chillies on behalf of farmers to the traders as commission agents.They sell goods on behalf of farmers to the traders, issue invoices to the traders/buyers as prescribed under the APMC Act and also issue sale patties to the farmers.They collect a commission on the services provided to the farmers from the purchasers and the same is also shown in the invoice issued to the purchasers.Issue Involved Whether the applicant is required to be registered under the GST Act? Observation/Ruling Schedule I CGST Act, 2017 states that “Supply of goods— (a) by a principal to his agent where the agent undertakes to supply s…

High Court directed authorities to re-open portal for filing of Form GST TRAN-1

High Court of Guwahati gave an important judgment dated 26th September, 2019 regarding filing of Form GSTR TRAN-1 electronically or manually in case of Sakshi motors V. Union of India [2019] 112 223 (GUAHATI) which is discussed as below:
Facts of the Case The applicant is a private limited company engaged in the trade of dealing in food items, edibles, FMCG etc. They are unable to submit the Form GST TRAN-2 in relation to Part-7A. According to the applicant, they have submitted TRAN-1 return in a proper complete and correct manner.But inspite of such filing, the GST portal does not reflect the value of the stock returned, against which he is entitled to get import credit on filing of TRAN-2 return.Observation/Judgment It is observed that the taxpayer had made all the attempts to file the form electronically but because of computer glitches, the same could not be filed. Therefore, HC directed taxpaying authorities to re-open web por…